Trace the path.
We follow the lead from capture to CRM to Slack to owner and mark the points where speed, data, or accountability breaks.
For SaaS teams losing money between form fill and follow-up
Stop losing pipeline in the handoff.
Zyphh connects forms, CRM rules, AI drafts, approvals, Slack alerts, and reporting around your demo request. Start with one guarded 14-day pilot. Expand only when the metric moves.
One workflow first14-day pilotCRM, Slack, n8n, MakeHuman approval on risky actions
01CaptureDemo request
02EnrichFit + intent
03RouteNamed owner
04ApproveRisk checked
05ReportAction logged
Your best buyer is also the easiest one to mishandle.
A high-intent demo request lands. The CRM record is half-empty. The territory rule is unclear. The rep gets the alert late, without context, and the first reply sounds like every other vendor.
That is not a marketing problem or a sales problem. It is a handoff problem. Fix the handoff and the same traffic starts producing cleaner pipeline.
More software rarely fixes this by itself. The form, CRM, enrichment provider, and sales channel may all be capable. The missing piece is the event order, ownership rule, and visible exception path between them.
Before
Form fill
Shared inbox
Manual copy
Owner guessed
42 hour delay
After
Validated record
Fit score
Owner rule
Logged follow-up
Under 4 hours
routing accuracy
data hygiene
SLA coverage
The 14-day handoff fix.
One narrow workflow. One owner. One measurable leak. Then we build the automation around the way your team actually sells.
The pilot includes the boring parts that keep the result alive: test records, retries, catch-all ownership, approvals where risk is high, execution logs, and a decision at the end to expand, repair, or stop.
Build the control layer.
Routing rules, enrichment, AI drafts, approvals, logging, and reporting ship as one pilot, not six disconnected automations.
Prove or stop.
If the pilot improves the metric, we expand. If it does not, you still leave with the workflow map and the truth.
Get a useful answer before you talk to us.
The Pipeline Leak Score asks six practical questions about response speed, routing logic, CRM hygiene, reporting trust, manual hours, and escalation. The result tells you whether automation is the first move or whether the process needs repair first.
Run the leak score
Leak score
54
Most teams do not need more software first. They need to see exactly where the handoff breaks.
We build the interface around the workflow, too.
Good automation still fails when nobody can see what happened. Zyphh builds the control surfaces around the system: routing views, agent approval queues, score tools, logs, and reporting boards.
Healthy background activity stays quiet. Exceptions, service-level risk, and actions waiting for a person receive the attention. The interface exists to shorten a decision, not to add another dashboard.
See what we buildRouting command center
Qualified leads, owner rules, SLA timers, and exception queues.
AI action console
Drafts, approvals, source context, and tool-call logs.
Revenue trust board
Pipeline, report defects, source quality, and Friday questions.
Show us the handoff that keeps breaking.
We will tell you whether to automate it, redesign it, or leave it alone. The first call should make the decision clearer, even if you never buy.